Skip to content

Multiple-choice questions (MCQs) with answers on “Judicial Review and Judicial Activism in India” designed for Civil Services Examination

1. What is Judicial Review in India?

  • a) Review of laws by the judiciary
  • b) Review of executive actions by the legislature
  • c) Review of parliamentary procedures
  • d) Review of election laws
  • Answer: a) Review of laws by the judiciary

2. Which part of the Indian Constitution explicitly provides for Judicial Review?

  • a) Preamble
  • b) Part III and Part IV
  • c) Article 368
  • d) None of the above
  • Answer: b) Part III and Part IV

3. Which Article empowers the Supreme Court for Judicial Review?

  • a) Article 32
  • b) Article 13
  • c) Article 226
  • d) Article 136
  • Answer: b) Article 13

4. Judicial Review in India is based on which of the following doctrines?

  • a) Rule of Law
  • b) Doctrine of Precedent
  • c) Doctrine of Basic Structure
  • d) Doctrine of Separation of Powers
  • Answer: c) Doctrine of Basic Structure

5. The landmark case which established the concept of Judicial Review in India was:

  • a) Minerva Mills Case
  • b) Golaknath Case
  • c) Kesavananda Bharati Case
  • d) Shankari Prasad Case
  • Answer: c) Kesavananda Bharati Case

6. Judicial Activism refers to:

  • a) Strict interpretation of the Constitution
  • b) The judiciary actively interpreting laws to fill gaps in legislation
  • c) Passing new laws by the judiciary
  • d) Limiting the power of executive action
  • Answer: b) The judiciary actively interpreting laws to fill gaps in legislation

7. Public Interest Litigation (PIL) is associated with:

  • a) Judicial Activism
  • b) Judicial Review
  • c) Executive Powers
  • d) Legislature’s Role
  • Answer: a) Judicial Activism

8. Which of the following is the first PIL case in India?

  • a) Hussainara Khatoon v. State of Bihar
  • b) Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
  • c) S.P. Gupta v. Union of India
  • d) Minerva Mills v. Union of India
  • Answer: a) Hussainara Khatoon v. State of Bihar

9. Which Article provides for PIL under Judicial Activism?

  • a) Article 32
  • b) Article 136
  • c) Article 226
  • d) Both a) and c)
  • Answer: d) Both a) and c)

10. Which doctrine was introduced by the Supreme Court in the case of Kesavananda Bharati?

  • a) Doctrine of Severability
  • b) Doctrine of Basic Structure
  • c) Doctrine of Eclipse
  • d) Doctrine of Lapse
  • Answer: b) Doctrine of Basic Structure

11. Which of the following is NOT considered a form of Judicial Activism?

  • a) Judicial restraint
  • b) Judicial overreach
  • c) Suo moto actions
  • d) Issuing guidelines in absence of legislation
  • Answer: a) Judicial restraint

12. In which case did the Supreme Court emphasize that Judicial Review is a basic feature of the Constitution?

  • a) Maneka Gandhi Case
  • b) S.R. Bommai Case
  • c) L. Chandra Kumar Case
  • d) Vishakha Case
  • Answer: c) L. Chandra Kumar Case

13. The power of Judicial Review was originally borrowed from the Constitution of:

  • a) United Kingdom
  • b) Canada
  • c) United States of America
  • d) Australia
  • Answer: c) United States of America

14. The concept of Judicial Activism in India can be traced back to which Chief Justice?

  • a) M. Hidayatullah
  • b) P.N. Bhagwati
  • c) A.S. Anand
  • d) K.G. Balakrishnan
  • Answer: b) P.N. Bhagwati

15. Which of the following is an example of Judicial Overreach?

  • a) Striking down unconstitutional laws
  • b) Amending laws passed by Parliament
  • c) Guiding government policy
  • d) Correcting executive lapses
  • Answer: b) Amending laws passed by Parliament

16. Which of the following cases is associated with Judicial Activism concerning environmental protection?

  • a) Vishakha v. State of Rajasthan
  • b) M.C. Mehta v. Union of India
  • c) Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
  • d) ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla
  • Answer: b) M.C. Mehta v. Union of India

17. Which of the following doctrines helps in preserving the fundamental rights of individuals through Judicial Review?

  • a) Doctrine of Severability
  • b) Doctrine of Prospective Overruling
  • c) Doctrine of Colourable Legislation
  • d) Doctrine of Pith and Substance
  • Answer: a) Doctrine of Severability

18. The ‘Basic Structure Doctrine’ limits which power of the Parliament?

  • a) Judicial Powers
  • b) Legislative Powers
  • c) Power to amend the Constitution
  • d) Power to impeach the President
  • Answer: c) Power to amend the Constitution

19. The Supreme Court’s judgment in the Vishakha Case is an example of:

  • a) Judicial Review
  • b) Judicial Restraint
  • c) Judicial Activism
  • d) Doctrine of Precedent
  • Answer: c) Judicial Activism

20. Which of the following is a criticism of Judicial Activism?

  • a) It promotes checks and balances
  • b) It helps protect fundamental rights
  • c) It infringes on the powers of the legislature and executive
  • d) It promotes rule of law
  • Answer: c) It infringes on the powers of the legislature and executive

21. Which Article provides the power of Judicial Review to High Courts?

  • a) Article 12
  • b) Article 226
  • c) Article 356
  • d) Article 262
  • Answer: b) Article 226

22. Which is a key difference between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism?

  • a) Judicial Review is pro-legislature; Judicial Activism is pro-judiciary
  • b) Judicial Review is the court’s ability to examine laws; Judicial Activism is proactive policy intervention
  • c) Judicial Review focuses on policy making; Judicial Activism focuses on correcting laws
  • d) Judicial Review is activism through the law; Judicial Activism is legislative empowerment
  • Answer: b) Judicial Review is the court’s ability to examine laws; Judicial Activism is proactive policy intervention

23. The Supreme Court’s order in the Vishakha guidelines led to:

  • a) Provisions against human trafficking
  • b) Legislation on sexual harassment at the workplace
  • c) Legal reforms for protecting the environment
  • d) Expansion of reservation policies
  • Answer: b) Legislation on sexual harassment at the workplace

24. In which case did the Supreme Court invalidate the 39th Amendment under Judicial Review?

  • a) Golaknath Case
  • b) Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain
  • c) Kesavananda Bharati Case
  • d) Minerva Mills Case
  • Answer: b) Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain

25. What is the primary objective of Judicial Activism?

  • a) Protect executive authority
  • b) Preserve individual rights and promote social justice
  • c) Enforce parliamentary sovereignty
  • d) Maintain fiscal discipline in the government
  • Answer: b) Preserve individual rights and promote social justice

26. Which case is an example of the judiciary reviewing the validity of constitutional amendments?

  • a) Kesavananda Bharati Case
  • b) A.K. Gopalan Case
  • c) Maneka Gandhi Case
  • d) Shankari Prasad Case
  • Answer: a) Kesavananda Bharati Case

27. Judicial Review is based on the principle of:

  • a) Independence of judiciary
  • b) Rule of Law
  • c) Constitutional Supremacy
  • d) Federalism
  • Answer: c) Constitutional Supremacy

28. Which of the following cases led to the introduction of the ‘due process of law’ principle in Indian jurisprudence?

  • a) Golaknath Case
  • b) Maneka Gandhi Case
  • c) S.R. Bommai Case
  • d) Minerva Mills Case
  • Answer: b) Maneka Gandhi Case

29. Judicial Activism is often associated with which type of court intervention?

  • a) Policy formulation
  • b) Interpretation of existing laws
  • c) Striking down policies
  • d) Advising the executive branch
  • Answer: b) Interpretation of existing laws

30. The ‘Doctrine of Eclipse’ in Judicial Review pertains to:

  • a) Protection of minority rights
  • b) Temporary unconstitutionality of laws
  • c) International law considerations
  • d) Preventing misuse of executive powers
  • Answer: b) Temporary unconstitutionality of laws

These questions cover various aspects of Judicial Review and Judicial Activism in India, which are important topics in Civil Services Examination preparation.

Cart
Back To Top
error: Content is protected !!