From Trade to Territory: The Company Establishes Power – Long Answer Type Questions
Topic A: Background & Trade
Answer:
The British East India Company was founded in 1600 by English merchants who obtained a royal charter to trade in the East Indies. Its early objectives were commercial — to buy desirable Asian commodities such as spices, textiles and indigo and sell them in European markets for profit. The Company established factories (trading posts) on the Indian coast to store goods, organise trade and negotiate with local authorities. Over time, commercial competition with other European powers and involvement in local politics pushed it toward military and political roles.
Answer:
Competition with the Dutch, French and Portuguese for trade and influence led the British Company to adopt more aggressive policies. To protect trade routes and settlements, the Company fortified its factories, raised armed forces, and engaged in naval and land conflicts. Rivalry with the French, especially in the mid‑18th century, turned trade competition into open military confrontation in some regions, which sharpened the Company’s political ambitions and readiness to intervene in local power struggles.
Answer:
Local intermediaries — including merchants, brokers and bankers — linked producers and the Company. They supplied goods, organised transportation, negotiated prices, and provided intelligence on markets and politics. Their networks were crucial for procuring commodities and for navigating local customs and credit systems. Sometimes these intermediaries also allied with the Company for mutual advantage, which helped the Company secure resources and influence.
Answer:
Trading posts were often on the coast and near navigable rivers, making shipment to Europe easier and cheaper. Coastal locations such as Surat and Calcutta provided safe harbours, storage for goods, and proximity to trade routes. These sites also facilitated contact with regional producers and merchants and allowed the Company to control maritime trade flows, which was vital to maintaining its commercial dominance.
Answer:
A 'factory' was a trading post where Company factors (agents) conducted business. It housed warehouses for storage, offices for record‑keeping, and living quarters. Factories negotiated purchases, managed credit, arranged shipping, kept accounts and maintained small defensive forces. They acted as local hubs connecting rural producers with international markets.
Answer:
The shift was enabled by militarisation (Company armies protecting trade), political interventions (supporting claimants in succession disputes), financial power (access to local revenues), and weaknesses in regional polities. Military victories like Plassey gave the Company leverage to influence rulers, while revenue rights provided funds to sustain administration and forces. Over time, these elements combined to convert commercial influence into territorial control.
Topic B: The Battle of Plassey and Its Consequences
Answer:
Causes included Company anger at the seizure of its goods and political disagreements with Siraj‑ud‑Daulah, the Nawab of Bengal. The Company, led by Robert Clive, exploited internal dissent among the Nawab's commanders and forged secret agreements. The battle featured a small but decisive confrontation at Plassey where key defections occurred. The outcome was a Company victory, weakening the Nawab and allowing the Company to influence Bengal’s politics.
Answer:
Key Bengali commanders and nobles felt threatened or bribed and therefore defected or withheld support from Siraj‑ud‑Daulah. The Company negotiated clandestine agreements that promised rewards and protection, undermining the Nawab’s position. These internal betrayals were decisive because they deprived the Nawab of military strength at the crucial moment, enabling the Company to secure victory with relatively few troops.
Answer:
Immediately after Plassey, the Company installed a pliant ruler and exercised influence over succession and administration. It gained political leverage to demand concessions and shape policies favourable to trade. This informal control undermined traditional authority and set the stage for direct administrative responsibilities once Diwani rights were obtained.
Answer:
Plassey’s political gains allowed the Company to extract greater economic benefits from Bengal through control of trade privileges and later revenue rights. By influencing administration and securing revenue streams, the Company significantly increased its income, which financed its army and bureaucracy and enabled further territorial expansion.
Answer:
Long‑term, Plassey marked the beginning of colonial political dominance in eastern India, weakening indigenous power structures. It led to changes in land revenue administration that affected peasants and zamindars, altered economic patterns to favour export‑oriented trade, and paved the way for deeper British intervention across India.
Answer:
While military action took place, Plassey’s success hinged on political manoeuvring — bribery, alliances and exploitation of local rivalries. Thus, it was as much a diplomatic and political triumph as a battlefield victory. The Company’s ability to influence local elites and manipulate succession was crucial to its success.
Topic C: Diwani, Revenue and Administration
Answer:
In 1765 the Mughal emperor granted the Company the Diwani of Bengal, Bihar and Orissa—i.e., the right to collect revenue. This was significant because it provided a steady fiscal base for the Company to fund its army and administration, effectively transforming it into a territorial power with governance responsibilities rather than a mere trading firm.
Answer:
Revenue control meant the Company no longer depended solely on trade profits; it could draw on land taxes to finance military campaigns, pay officials and maintain governance structures. This financial autonomy enabled sustained territorial administration and made the Company politically independent and powerful in the region.
Answer:
The Company established offices for revenue collection, record‑keeping and judiciary functions. It appointed local agents and supervisors, introduced systems of accounts and registers, and set up courts and policing mechanisms. These changes professionalised administration but often prioritized revenue extraction over welfare.
Answer:
Revenue farmers were contractors who agreed to pay a fixed sum to the Company in return for the right to collect taxes in a district. While this secured predictable income for the Company, it often encouraged over‑collection and exploitation by contractors seeking to make profits, worsening peasants’ hardships.
Answer:
Company revenue demands often increased pressure on peasants, leading to indebtedness, sale of land, and reduced subsistence capacity. Intermediaries and corrupt collectors sometimes extracted excessive levies. Economic insecurity and occasional famines exacerbated rural distress, altering agrarian relations and social structures.
Answer:
The Company introduced systematic record‑keeping and governance structures that could improve administration, dispute resolution and infrastructure. However, these developments were often geared toward revenue extraction and imperial interests, leading to exploitative practices that harmed peasants and artisans. Thus, administrative changes had mixed social impacts.
Topic D: Economic and Social Consequences
Answer:
Artisans faced declining patronage as wealthy patrons' incomes changed and European manufactured goods entered Indian markets. The demand for raw materials for export and shifts in trade patterns undermined traditional craft economies, leading to reduced incomes and unemployment among craftsmen in certain regions.
Answer:
Some towns expanded as administrative and commercial hubs where the Company set up offices, courts and warehouses. Growth occurred in port towns linked to international trade. Conversely, towns reliant on traditional crafts declined when markets contracted or were reoriented to European demands.
Answer:
Land revenue changes empowered certain intermediaries and altered ownership patterns. Some peasants lost land due to debt, while new classes of revenue collectors or landlords emerged. These shifts affected social hierarchies and created tensions between dispossessed cultivators and new proprietors.
Answer:
While Company policies stimulated some commercial activity, emphasis on revenue extraction, monopolies and market reorientation often impoverished local producers and peasants. The net effect varied regionally, but many communities experienced hardship due to heavy taxation, disrupted trade networks and loss of livelihood.
Answer:
Export orientation encouraged production of cash crops in some areas, changing cropping patterns and local economies. This could increase incomes for some but made peasants vulnerable to market fluctuations. Local subsistence economies were sometimes undermined, increasing reliance on monetary transactions and credit.
Answer:
Positive aspects included introduction of record‑keeping, standardised accounts, rudimentary courts and law enforcement which could enhance predictability and administrative clarity. These systems provided foundations for modern bureaucratic governance, albeit primarily serving Company interests.
Topic E: Resistance and Local Responses
Answer:
Resistance ranged from petitions and legal complaints to violent uprisings. Peasant protests against high taxes, zamindar revolts, and local confrontations with revenue collectors occurred. While specific large‑scale revolts are more prominent in later periods, early local resistance revealed popular discontent and posed challenges to Company authority.
Answer:
Some elites allied with the Company to retain or enhance their status, gain protection, or benefit from new revenue arrangements. Collaboration could offer personal advantage—access to markets, official positions or security—though it sometimes alienated them from wider social groups.
Answer:
The Company often responded with a mix of force and negotiation: military suppression for serious threats, punitive measures to deter rebellion, and co‑option of leaders through rewards or appointments. Administrative reforms might follow to address grievances selectively, but coercion was common.
Answer:
Local reactions reveal the social impact of colonial policies, everyday resistances, and the limits of Company authority. They provide grassroots perspectives often missing from Company records and help historians reconstruct broader social dynamics.
Topic F: Sources and Historiography
Answer:
Historians use Company records (correspondence, accounts), revenue registers, travellers' accounts, local chronicles and archaeological evidence. Company records provide administrative detail and figures; local accounts offer social perspectives; archaeological finds corroborate material culture. Together, they allow triangulation of evidence for robust interpretations.
Answer:
Early interpretations often emphasised Company efficiency or saw expansion as a civilising mission. Later scholarship highlighted economic exploitation, political manipulation and social disruption. Recent historians adopt nuanced views, stressing local negotiations, varied impacts, and the complexity of interactions between Company agents and Indian actors.